May 2009
Copyright © 2009 Queue,
Inc.
IN
THIS ISSUE:
Missouri Rises Above the Nationwide Dropout
Crisis
0 High Schools Earn ÒA+Ó Designation by State Board of
Education
Education Watch: Tracking Achievement,
Attainment, and Opportunity in AmericaÕs Public Schools
Missouri Education Report Back Issues (http://www.queuenews.com/MOnews.html)
Subscribe
to Education Research Report Ð jdk@queueinc.com
Education Research Report Back
Issues (http://queueeducation.blogspot.com)
Queue Offers
Free Previews
Queue,
Inc. is offering public schools free previews of QueueÕs best-selling test prep
and curriculum-based workbooks. Queue publishes test prep workbooks in reading
comprehension and math for grades 2-8 based on the MAP standards as well
as a a wide variety of workbooks in language arts, reading comprehension, math
and science ideal for test prep.
Go
to http://www.qworkbooks.com/MO/MO.html
descriptions.
Order
previews online, or call Queue at 800.232.2224.
A
dozen states significantly improved their high school graduation rates between
2002 and 2006, while the rest of the nation lagged behind, according to a
report by researchers at the new Everyone Graduates Center at the Johns Hopkins
University.
Tennessee
led the way with an 11 percentage point increase in its graduation rate,
according to the report, "Progress Toward Increasing National and State
Graduation Rates." The other 11 states and their percentage point
increases are:
- Delaware, 6.8 percentage points
- Kentucky, 6.8
- S. Dakota, 5.3
- Arkansas, 5.2
- Alabama, 4.1
- N. Carolina, 3.6
- New York, 3.5
- Hawaii, 3.4
- Missouri, 3.4
- Nebraska, 3.1
- New Hampshire, 3.0
This
progress report comes on the heels of a major education address by President
Obama in which he cited the work of Johns Hopkins education researchers in
identifying the 2,000 high schools that produce half of the nation's dropouts,
and issued a challenge to all Americans to turn around these low-performing
schools.
The
report draws on several methods of measuring graduation rates to make its
assessments. The rate increases represent thousands of high school graduates
who might not have earned diplomas a few years ago.
The State Board of Education today voted to
approve the designation of 20 Missouri public high schools as ÒA+ Schools,Ó
based on the boardÕs standards. As a result, eligible seniors in these
schools may receive state-paid tuition assistance to attend a community college
or technical school.
The A+ Schools
program was created by state law in 1993. It is intended to raise
academic standards in participating high schools, improve the graduation rate
and prepare more students for postsecondary learning and high-wage jobs.
With todayÕs action by the State Board of
Education, 274 public high schools have qualified for A+ status.
The newly designated schools are:
á
Bayless
High School, St. Louis
á
Crocker
High School
á
Richland
R-IV High School
á
Marion
County R-II High School, Philadelphia
á
McDonald
County High School, Anderson
á
Winfield
High School
á
Oak
Grove High School
á
North
Harrison R-III High School, Eagleville
á
Hillcrest
High School, Springfield
á
Kickapoo
High School, Springfield
á
New
Haven High School
á
Cuba
High School
á
Bourbon
High School
á
Blair
Oaks High School
á
Billings
High School
á
Chadwick
High School
á
Archie
High School
á
South
Callaway R-II High School, Mokane
á
Woodland
High School, Marble Hill
á
Savannah
High School
This year (2008-09), the state is providing $25.2 million to underwrite the assistance for eligible A+ students. Since 1997, more than 38,000 students have used the A+ benefit for at least one semester of attendance at a community college.
To qualify, high school graduates must
attend an A+ school for at least three years, have a grade-point average of at
least 2.5 on a 4-point scale, maintain a 95 percent attendance record, and
perform 50 hours of unpaid tutoring in the school district.
Members
of the Class of 2009 who attend the newly designated A+ Schools will be
eligible to use their state assistance as early as this summer, if they are
ready to enroll in a community college.
Last
month, Congress made an unprecedented commitment to AmericaÕs public schools,
passing the single biggest increase in federal education funding in our
nationÕs history. As the U.S. Department of Education begins to distribute the one-time
funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), the
onus is on states to live up to that challenge and ensure that this investment
boosts overall achievement and closes gaps.
To
measure how effectively states are using the infusion of federal support, the
public will need accurate, reliable data. The Education TrustÕs Education
Watch series assembles some of the most critical indicators of
student achievement, attainment, and opportunity, providing a state-by-state
snapshot of public education in America.
The
data in these reports and the accompanying Òquick lookÓ chart
mark the starting line in AmericaÕs ÒRace to the TopÓ Ð the federal effort to
provoke bold, enduring progress in education. Education Watch reveals which states are
farthest along the course, which are gaining on those leaders, and which are
barely out of the starting blocks. Throughout the duration of ARRA spending,
The Education Trust will provide updates on state progress as new data become
available.
These
reports reflect the most up-to-date information available across states. While some states
may have more recent data on their own schools and reform efforts, Education
Watch
uses only data that are consistent across states. This allows for accurate
comparisons and the ability to identify and learn from the leaders on each
indicator. While no state is yet where it needs to be, especially in terms of
educating lower income students and students of color, some are doing a much
better job than others.
For
example, on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP):
á
In
eighth-grade math, Massachusetts leads the nation in gains overall since 2000, and
was among the top gainers for Latinos and lower income students. However, state
improvement among African-American students (6 points) lagged significantly
behind the national average (16 points), resulting in a widening of the
performance gap between African-American and white students. Massachusetts was
one of just two states in which an achievement gap between student subgroups
grew larger.
Though
each state is different, common patterns emerge from these NAEP data,
indicating just how far we have to go to ensure that all young Americans have
equal access to a high-quality education Ð especially lower income students and
students of color, who now comprise almost half of all students in our
nationÕs public schools. Student performance is too low overall, varying
dramatically between student groups, and the pace of improvement is far too
slow.
ÒThese
reports provide a sobering look at the challenging work that lies ahead,Ó said
Kati Haycock, president of The Education Trust. ÒOne thing is clear: To secure
our economic future, we must confront educational inequities head-on and ensure
that every school in America is ready to help every student advance farther,
faster. The federal dollars are not a license to do business as usual; they
come with a demand for change. We will never have this opportunity again, so
the pressure is on for states to invest big in what works for kids and stop
supporting the policies and programs that simply arenÕt getting the job done.Ó
When
evaluating student achievement data, many people are quick to attribute
performance to the home lives of students. But the variation of results among
states for the same groups of students proves that what happens in school matters immensely.
ThatÕs
why the Education Watch data on opportunity in education offer a valuable way to
compare student achievement, taking into account the level of resources
available to each student group. A look at these data show that lower income
students and students of color Ð the ones who most often come to school with
less Ð are consistently and systematically provided with less of everything
that research and experience tell us matters most in school: less access to
well-prepared, effective teachers; less access to challenging curriculum; and
less funding.
For
example:
Missouri
report:
http://www2.edtrust.org/edtrust/summaries2009/Missouri.pdf
State
reports:
http://www2.edtrust.org/edtrust/summaries2009/states.html